The Widow’s Guide to Sex and Dating by Carole Radziwill – Extract

The Widow's Guide to Sex and Dating

Charles Byrne, Sexologist and Writer, Dies at 54
by Mark Iocolano, The New York Times

Charles Byrne, renowned sexologist and author of the National Book Award–winning Thinker’s Hope, as well as numerous pivotal studies on sexual norms and morality, died Wednesday from a head injury incurred at Madison Avenue near 61st Street, according to a statement issued by Mr Byrne’s longtime publisher, Knopf.

Charles Fisher Byrne grew up in Bristol, Connecticut, the son of socialite and philanthropist Grace Thornton and the Honorable Franz Byrne, who, as clerk under Supreme Court justice Steven Ball, wrote a landmark 1972 memorandum arguing that it was discriminatory for states to forbid men from having sexual relations with sheep while not forbidding women. He was influential in overturning Merino v. Johnson in Minnesota, the case credited for igniting the curiosity and passion his son later brought to the subject that defined his career.

Charles Byrne attended Princeton for both his graduate and undergraduate studies, and held several honorary degrees. He published his first academic paper on sexual paraphilia called ‘Erotic Variations on a Theme,’ his junior year. It contained the seeds of what was to become his most widely known theory. Mr Byrne promoted respectful promiscuity as an ideal state for fostering a stable, family-based culture. ‘Love and sex,’ he wrote, ‘are impossible roommates. You may have one or the other in a companion, but not both.’ He also believed that sexuality is the purest form of artistic expression, a theme that later proliferated his novel Thinker’s Hope. Mr Byrne was a member of a now-fading literary scene and a regular fixture at iconic establishments such as the White Horse Tavern, where he and Philip Roth enjoyed a long-standing chess match. He counted among his closest friends a colorful variety of artists and intellectuals, from the controversial French lettriste Isidore Isou to the American comedian Paul Reubens.

Byrne published Thinker’s Hope in 1991, at the age of twenty-six. It won the National Book Award. He followed it up the next year with The Half-Life of Sex, an instant bestseller. Charlie, as he was known to friends, apprenticed at the infamous Sandstone Sexual Institute in Malibu under Robert Rimmer, whom he credited as his mentor.

It was during this time that Mr Byrne wrote a series of critical essays on what he saw as the existential crisis of the penis, titled, appropriately, ‘The State of Erection.’ Mr Byrne published many more books, all bestsellers, including Sperm and Whiskey; Sex, Sea Songs and Sartre; and Driving with Her Head in Your Lap. It’s been speculated that he was working on a new book at the time of his death.

Mr Byrne is survived by his mother, Grace, and his wife, Claire Byrne.


The upshot of the story is this: A man falls dead, the widow gets laid, love is a drag, the end. In the gaps, a woman finds meaning. The man fell dead on a Monday in New York; it was sunny, there was a breeze. Birds chirped in the suburbs, trains were on time, the postmen made their rounds. It was a mild day with a calm blue sky. Thoughts in offices around the city meandered from sex to lunch plans to the e-mail about smells in the break room. The day was ripe for calamity. It was the kind of day when the brakes fail on the tour bus, the leading man falls for a woman his own age, and the elderly pair in 4B shuffle out in handcuffs with the police. It was the kind of day when no one expects anything to happen, so it does. Blue skies can be misleading.

Claire Byrne was in Texas to see a man named Veejay Singh, a doctor, but not the medical kind. He taught sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, and he’d written a book titled Why Breasts Don’t Matter. Dr Singh was popular on campus, both for his friendly manner and for his notoriously easy grades. He was a minor celebrity, too, appearing on The Today Show now and again to explain his evolutionary theories about mating. Claire was there to interview him. She was writing a profile piece for Misconstrued, the magazine ‘for women, like you, who defy definition!’ She parked her rented car in the visitors’ section by the admin building and began her stroll toward Singh’s office at approximately ten after nine, weaving through oak trees and sun-dappled shade, her espadrilles marking lines across the dewy green quad. Claire’s husband, Charlie, was at home in New York.

Well, he wasn’t technically  home.

RULE #1: Don’t screw around on a Monday.

Claire had left the previous day, so Charlie spent the afternoon and night across town with the new publicist at Knopf. They’d spent their time in the girl’s cramped studio apartment humping and screwing like dogs, but now he, too, traversed trees and dapples, crossing Central Park toward Madison to meet with his agent, Richard Ashe. Charlie had a book overdue by two years and Richard was anxious. He had a dwindling number of profitable writers and a heavily mortgaged co-op. Charlie didn’t think much of deadlines.

Charles Byrne was the world’s most famous sexologist – more mainstream than Kinsey or Masters ever were. As much sexual object as academic, he wrote on a subject that everyone likes to read about, and he looked like someone you could easily imagine in the act. At fifty-four, in fact, he bore a passing resemblance to Warren Beatty – in Bugsy, not Reds – and possessed a rough-edged but overpowering charm. He was crafty with words, engaging on many different levels, so that his appeal spread wide. When he wrote about the penis, he managed to be both educational and downbeat, couching bawdy locker-room humor in intellectual wit. When he wrote about vaginas, he wrote with the appreciative and admiring eye of a collector. His writing made even coarse men think of symphonic productions as they bedded their irritable wives. It made sophisticated men think fondly of their wives as they bedded their steamy lovers.

Charlie was thinking fondly of his own young wife as he interrupted his walk for coffee at a diner on Madison, and this is a good place to play what if. You know – what if he hadn’t stopped, or not stopped for so long, or what if he’d been distracted by some small thing that slowed his pace.

In the diner, Charlie skimmed the sports page and phoned Richard to say he’d be late. He ordered a second coffee to go (what if he hadn’t?), put four dollar bills on the counter (what if he’d fum- bled and only put three?), then left to resume his walk.

While Charlie was perusing pitching stats – Wang and Hughes out of the Yankees rotation, Pettitte in – Claire was taking in cowboy-booted coeds in sundresses, thinking how she’d describe the scene back to him. (Russ Meyer directing a commercial for the Gap? No, more like a Playboy production of Oklahoma.) She’d been tempted to buy him one of those T-shirts in the airport: a buxom cowgirl riding a cactus, below the slogan EVERYTHING’S BIGGER IN TEXAS. It was the sort of thing Charlie might wear under his suit coat to the theater just for laughs.

Charlie enjoyed causing a scandal; he relished the attention. Claire, on the other hand, preferred anonymity. She was a petite woman, size 4, not tall – in heels she reached Charlie’s shoulder. She had dark hair that she wore long and loose, youthful skin, pale brown eyes, and what Charlie called complicated lips – they could be plump and sensual one day, and the next day nondescript. She was attractive, yes, but she wasn’t fooling anyone. She wasn’t a girl who lounged around uninhibitedly, slugging whiskey from the bottle. She wasn’t like the women Charlie wrote about. She didn’t know how to produce cigarettes for randy men to light; she wasn’t boozy or dramatic, her necklines didn’t plunge. She was ordered and neat, in contrast to Charlie’s flair. She was the ingenue to his rogue. Charlie was the main act. Sasha, Claire’s closest friend since college, called Charlie ‘Sundance,’ to Claire’s Butch Cassidy. ‘He cheats at poker and shoots up the room,’ Sasha liked to say, ‘while you collect the chips and tidy up.’ Charlie cast a long shadow. Claire had learned early on with him that one of her better qualities was knowing where to stand in it.

Claire’s assignment in Texas that day was dull, but drama was waiting in the wings. By the time she reached Singh’s office with its view of the tree-lined South Mall, her husband was dead. A Giacometti – a large and very expensive piece of bronze – had dropped on top of him, in an unlucky twist of fate.

Days later, looking back, it seemed inevitable. Claire couldn’t imagine it playing out any other way. One minute Charlie was strolling down Madison working out sound bites in his head for the Nobel speech he was sure he’d eventually have to give. The next minute – poof – he was dead. One minute off to a postcoital meeting with Richard, the next instant, gone. Life changes in less time than it takes to say, ‘Fuck.’

He’d been preoccupied. He didn’t see the thing drop from the sky. How could he? There was no warning, no fear, no panic or pain; for Charlie, it was over quickly. Elsewhere, though, there were ripples. There were witnesses, for instance, like Mona Glisan, who were affected. Reporters converged, then multiplied like flies, mining stunned tourists for sound bites. There was a noise, ‘a loud crack,’ was how Mona described it. The bronze had been hanging from a crane and the cable holding it snapped, and she described it like that – a crack! – followed by a hollow-sounding jingle like an enormous key dropping to the ground. It made Mona’s ears ring. She put her hands over them reflexively while she described it.

The sculpture that dropped was over six feet tall. It weighed three hundred pounds and fell from twenty stories up. It had cost Walter White – his is another story altogether, we’ll come back to it – millions of dollars and was supposed to be lowered onto his terrace. Instead, it dropped on Charlie’s head.

Mona Glisan’s account was the first of many. Steve Johnson saw it, too. He was an art major at Columbia, and he spoke about the motion of the object and the illusion of weightlessness. ‘The absence of nothing,’ he said, ‘is something in itself.’ No one knew what he meant, but he spoke very slowly, which gave people the impression that they should. He was too slow, however, for the sergeant taking statements, who quickly moved on, leaving the lingering crowd at Steve’s mercy. ‘The serene elegance and grace,’ he continued, ‘of this exquisite piece of art, floating on air . . .’

Alberto Giacometti, who’d made the bronze, was dead, too. A large and brooding man, he’d been known for colossal bouts of depression. He would disappear into his studio for months at a time, whittling obsessively and shunning visitors, until he emerged with clay prototypes of the unwieldy, thin, and rutted works that made his name. Charlie’s piece was called Man Walking: a tall, skinny man formed into a walking motion with his head down, absorbed in thought the way Charlie had been until the two collided in mutual distraction. The sexologist and the statue were an unusual pairing, to say the least. Their introduction was made possible by Evelyn White, Walter’s wife. Her cursory pretensions in art, coupled with the discovery of her husband’s affair, had set the whole thing in motion. But we’ll come back to that, too.

Among the others who saw the collision was a woman from Ohio visiting New York with her church group on a theater package – one of those six-shows-in-three-days kinds of things that never include first runs. She saw Mamma Mia! and The Lion King, and was viewing the Simon Doonan window displays at Barneys when she saw Charlie die. She offered herself to Channel 6. ‘It was horrible,’ she said in a shaky voice as she wiped away tears. Then she lowered her voice an octave and addressed the camera directly. ‘The Lord works in mysterious ways.’

Another witness, a man from Brooklyn, performed for reporters as if he had a scene-stealing bit in a mob film – ‘Dere was dis huge (he pronounced it ‘yooj’) fuckin’ thing. Comes outta nowheh – Bam! Poor fuckin’ guy.’ The network channels didn’t air his remarks, but two days later The Howard Stern Show did; Stern’s producers had him reenact the scene between strippers in a tribute of sorts to Charlie. Howard had been a big fan.

But it was Paul Bowman, an ad exec, whose account got the most play. He seemed to capture the spirit of the incident. ‘It was, for lack of a more original word,’ he said, ‘surreal.’

‘What went through your mind?’ asked the reporter from ABC News. ‘Well, I think the stillness,’ Paul said. ‘It was abnormally quiet. I felt it, that stillness. That’s what made me look up. It was like an Ingrid Bergman, or Bergmar, film, you know, that French guy. It was like everything, just briefly, paused.’

Paul’s were the words that somehow hit the mark. They played on WFAN, they ran in the New York Times, and after the Associated Press picked up his version it spent two days on Yahoo! News – Most Viewed. His estranged wife, Amy Strauss-Bowman, a film studies professor at Rutgers and the reason Paul Bowman even knew the name Bergman/Bergmar, sneered when she read his account and its gratuitous but bungled display of cineaste. Amy knew that Paul’s greatest art form thus far was to belch out the fight song during televised football games. She also knew that, obviously, a rare Giacometti fluttering down the side of a forty-three-story building against a bright blue backdrop of sky was vintage Kenneth Anger, or maybe Fassbinder, but certainly not Bergman.

The sun, after Charlie’s death, remained out. The day ticked on unmoved, though a large bronze sculpture and a man both lay still on the sidewalk. Charlie was clearly dead, but there was concern about the bronze. Walter White had been called, and Walter White summoned lawyers. A lot of money lay on the ground tended by the unappreciative eye of the NYPD. Then, too, there was concern with liability.

Sidewalk traffic bunched. Taxi drivers honked at stopped police cars. Men in suits hurried past, unimpressed. A family from Denver stood, mouths agape; the mother put a chubby hand in front of first one child’s eyes, then the other’s. Fire trucks closed in, sirens wailed.

Charlie’s denim-clad legs, toned from years of tennis, were bent at unnatural angles; his arms were askew. He’d wound up ungainly. He would have been mortified.

Paramedics moved slowly about the body. The ambulance driver lit a cigarette and joined the firemen a few feet away. The men stood talking for a time; now and then, one would laugh. They argued over the Yankees and the Mets, and traded jokes about another stiff they’d picked up that week. Policemen continued to take statements from the witnesses, one at a time, writing in small notebooks with blue ballpoint pens. None of it came to much.

At some point midmorning the body was covered and Charlie’s limbs were secured to a metal bed. One arm slipped from beneath his sheet and dangled, the way arms sometimes do in suspense films to reveal something – a birthmark or tattoo, some important clue that has been overlooked. But this was Charlie’s right arm – no watch, no marks – and a paramedic replaced it beneath the sheet without incident.

Gawkers stayed stubbornly put. Finally, the medical examiner’s van arrived and Charlie was removed from the scene – one hour and thirteen minutes after leaving his four-dollar tip at the diner.

Another team arrived to load the Giacometti into an evidence truck. Walter White stood nervously in his doorway, inquiring. We’re taking it to the Sixty-First Precinct, Mr White. I can’t tell you yet how long we’ll need it. We have to file the usual reports. At that moment, Walter was unaware of who the dead man was.

Cleanup, for the most part, was brisk.

Meanwhile, in Texas, Claire sat in an uncomfortable chair across from Veejay Singh and worked to establish rapport. Dr Singh, like Charlie, moved easily between pop culture and more serious arenas. His subject specialty was the biology of attraction – the whys and hows of picking a mate. Men like long hair and big breasts, we assume. But is that really the case and, if so, why? Dr Singh had a theory, and he’d spent five years measuring women to prove it. He circled their hips and their waists with tailor’s tape and divided the second number by the first. He compared these ratios with estrogen levels and fertility data, and through his findings he promoted his idea that men are hardwired to seek a certain shape. More specifically, his research showed that women with a .7 hip-to-waist ratio –  wide hips and small waists – are good breeders. These women have the best odds of conceiving a baby, so men intuitively seek them out to reproduce. The famous hourglass figure, in other words, is not just a fashion trend but an important step in evolution.

Dr Singh was tall, like Charlie, and lean. He dressed simply – dark slacks, V-neck sweater – but his clothing flattered him. He became animated when he spoke about his work, punctuating his sentences with wide sweeps of his arms, and short bursts of laughter that were intended, Claire thought, to disarm her. She wondered if he slept with his students.

Singh’s book had debuted at #2 on the New York Times Best Sellers List. The book was why Claire was sitting here, why Misconstrued deemed his measurements worthy of print. Charlie, for his part, had snorted when she’d told him about the assignment – as if only a hack would write a bestseller about breasts instead of balls. That Claire was writing pop stories for glossy female magazines at all had everything to do with Charlie. He had discouraged her own literary ambition. For a few years after they married she had been content looking after Charlie’s needs and writing an occasional piece freelance. Then the temporary adjustment in her focus became what she did permanently. Charlie worked, and Claire found things to do.

They were just starting, Claire and Singh; they’d finished shifting in chairs and clearing their throats and were on Claire’s second question.

‘Is there any evidence, then, that the size of the penis matters, reproductively speaking?’ Just as a hint of a smile crossed her face, Claire’s cell phone began to buzz. She had set it to ‘vibrate.’ It lurched noisily across the desk.

‘I’m sorry, please ignore it,’ she said, and made a gesture with her hand to mean ‘go on.’

‘Before we get too far,’ said Singh, ‘let’s do this.’ He was holding a measuring tape. He jumped up, then motioned for Claire to stand so he might measure and calculate her own ratio, her own potential for reproduction.

‘I’ve studied every Playboy centerfold since 1954,’ he said, with his arms around Claire’s waist. While Claire held her arms up and out of the way, Singh dipped his head down, beneath her breasts, to read the thin tape he’d pressed against her. His hands felt warm through her blouse. He had a tantalizing mess of dark, thick hair; a heady shot of cologne hit her nose. Claire couldn’t remember the last time a man’s hands had circled her waist. Somewhere along her nine years with Charlie, certain interest had, well . . . waned. Singh mumbled a number and jotted it on his note pad. ‘And though the bunnies have gotten thinner’ – he paused as if about to reveal a great secret – ‘their hip-to-waist ratios have remained the same!’

A stack of transparencies lay on his desk – anatomically correct line drawings of well-ratioed women: Eva Mendes, Marilyn Monroe, Raquel Welch. He showed Claire, laying the drawings one over the other, how the shapes were different but the ratios stayed in line. ‘Watch this,’ he said, putting a transparency of Kate Moss over Scarlett Johansson. ‘Hmm? Surprised?’ ‘Well, Kate’s skinnier, and her breasts . . .’

‘But that’s it!’ Singh shrieked, delighted. ‘It’s not the breasts!’ He lowered his voice and leaned toward her. ‘It is strictly the proportion of the hip to the waist. It signals health and fertility. This is the true essence of desire.’

Claire looked down at her own small breasts. She wanted to believe him. She wondered if there was a Mrs Singh and, if so, what size her breasts were. He jotted her measurements on a note pad and did the math. ‘Ha! Point seven five,’ he said, appraising Claire’s reproductive area and nodding in approval.

‘Almost perfect!’

The buzzing persisted. Claire’s phone lurched forward, then stopped, then lurched again. Dr Singh took in the spectacle.

‘We should take a short break,’ he said.

Claire agreed, and while Singh ruffled papers she punched in the number for voice mail and pressed ‘1’ to play her messages. There were four: The first was a policeman in a somber tone: ‘Mrs Byrne, this is Officer Callan from the Nineteenth Precinct. I need you to contact me immediately, your husband . . . there’s been an accident.’ The second was Richard, who also asked her to call back and spoke in a suspiciously measured tone. The third was Ethan, Claire’s close friend and Charlie’s longtime assistant, who just said, ‘Honey. I’m sorry. Oh fuck.’

Sasha was fourth. She was sobbing and Claire could hear ice hitting glass. ‘Jesus, Claire, why aren’t you answering your phone? They dropped a Giacometti on Charlie. Turn the TV on! I can’t believe he’s dead. God . . . Richard said he didn’t suffer.’

Claire set her phone on the desk and looked at Singh shuf- fling paper stacks. She ran a couple of versions through her head, then settled on this: ‘My husband, I think, is dead.’ She looked toward the window and her gaze fell on an oak tree. Dr Singh took a step toward her then stopped. He lifted his arms up and dropped them. There were an awkward few moments of silence. ‘My God,’ he finally said.

Claire was married – seconds, minutes, hours ago? – and now she was not. A recent image of Charlie flashed before her. Last week, high off a tennis win and flush from gossip and scotch, he’d come home and whisked Claire off to the Circle Line tourist boat. For three hours he charmed and regaled her beneath the stars. It had been years since he’d been flirtatiously impulsive this way, with her. Had it been a sign?

Saturday, five days from now, they were expected at Charlie’s mother’s. He’d promised to make his veal fettuccine, Claire’s favorite dish. Only last week they’d been planning their summer rental with Sasha and Thom on the Vineyard. Charlie was here, moments ago, just yesterday in all of his celebrated charm, and now he was gone. Claire was looking at breasts, less than a minute ago, and now she was not. The rate of change in her life, the death-to-change ratio, if you will, had peaked.

The sky in Austin, too, was blue.

Excerpted from The Widow’s Guide to Sex and Dating by Carole Radziwill. Copyright © 2013 by Carole Radziwill.
First published in the United States in 2013 by Henry Holt & Co. This edition published in 2013 by Heron Books, an imprint of Quercus, 55 Baker Street, 7th Floor, South Block, London, W1U 8EW.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Pan Macmillan Australia solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s